Doug Oplinger: Ohioans offer solutions to opioid crisis

By Doug Oplinger - Your Voice Ohio

Give Ohioans time to listen to one another and they can assemble a plan to turn around the opioid addiction crisis. Journalists from the Your Voice Ohio media collaborative of nearly 40 print, radio, television and web news outlets met with several hundred people across the state in the last several months. The journalists were with the people, at the table, listening and sharing different perspectives on the opioid crisis that is killing 4,000 Ohioans annually.

In 11 meetings so far, there was consistency. There was a feeling of desperation among those struggling with recovery, and a feeling of guilt or helplessness in their families. That suffering is profound.

Moreover, there is deep-seated anger and hurt regarding the stigma with addiction that allows many government officials – and people – to hide behind accusations rather than action. They blamed media and American culture, and said the stigma prevents open discussion about practical solutions.

In the sessions, participants were asked after 90 minutes of discussion, to name ways the community and state should respond.

Here are solutions we heard:

•Respect, dignity and hope were prevailing themes. Without those, meaningful solutions are unlikely.

• The causes of this crisis vary widely. Action must reflect the multiple entry points. Alcohol was named repeatedly as a pervasive killer and pathway.

• Conversation must move from illegal activity to mental health. This shift has not happened in many counties.

• The medical community must engage reflectively in community discussion. Some patients are terrified of opioids and in awe of the ease with which they are prescribed. When one doctor joined the Cincinnati session, he added a new perspective.

• The word “trauma” was used repeatedly to describe impact on families. Education is imperative, not just for the children, but for the people who nurture them. We heard adults say young people need “coping skills” for difficult situations at home and socially.

• Data should be used across the state. Ohio makes little effort to do so. Cincinnati pinpoints overdose hotspots by collecting and publicly mapping all EMS OD calls every 24 hours. The city has evidence that this online feature is saving taxpayer dollars, lives, and reducing stress on first responders.

• Jobs: This is a crisis for Ohio. A work force of non-violent felons or people who cannot pass drug tests is unattractive to new industry. The Plain Dealer, using Ohio’s OD death list, identified industries prone to drug overdoses. What has been done to help those workers and businesses?

• People want to help. The most experienced and passionate people are from families who lost someone to opioids. Who will harness this power?

• The state program to distribute the overdose antidote Naloxone was well received.

• Tougher rules limiting opioid prescriptions did not receive uniform support. There is evidence that people in need of medically-directed pain treatment turned to illegal drugs.

• Rapid response teams that visit recent overdose victims have been effective in Hamilton and Lucas counties for a couple of years. There has been a recent rush to implement teams in other counties, yet rural areas with high death rates remain without.

• Jail coordination: We heard anecdotal evidence of many dying after release from jail. While the attorney general has discussed re-entry programs at a few jails, there is no uniformity.

• Drug courts: Some counties have become highly effective at using seamless services through drug courts to gain treatment in lieu of a criminal record. We saw differences in death rates between two similar counties where one had medically assisted treatment through drug court and the other did not. In a state that routinely ranks among the top four for death rates, should there be an 88-county policy?

• Needle exchanges: So what is the Ohio law? We know the answer, yet in some counties where health departments want needle exchanges, prosecutors block implementation with the argument that exchanges are either unsupported in law or they support illegal activity. Meanwhile, numbers illustrate clearly that the costs to families and the state are rising due to more cases of hepatitis, HIV and heart disease caused by dirty needles. This is low-cost, high-reward intervention, yet Ohio’s aversion to local control allows people to die.

• Safe-injection rooms allow the use of controlled substances under supervision. This idea was raised in many conversations. These are used effectively in foreign countries, reducing deaths, spread of disease and reducing the need for EMS calls. What are the reasons this is not discussed openly?

• Visit the web site of any county as if in a life-and-death panic and begin to understand how difficult it is to find help. In many cases, resources are not conspicuous, including in crisis counties. There is no state leadership on web templates.

• We heard multiple anecdotes of ineffective local services, mostly because the victim or family struggling with recovery was left to their own to find the help. Who tests the system for its effectiveness?

By Doug Oplinger

Your Voice Ohio

Doug Oplinger is the former managing editor of the Akron Beacon Journal and now leads the Your Voice Ohio media collaborative. He can be emailed at

Doug Oplinger is the former managing editor of the Akron Beacon Journal and now leads the Your Voice Ohio media collaborative. He can be emailed at

Post navigation