By Robert B. Reich
Syndicated Columnist
The two men most likely to square off for the presidency of the United States next Election Day have held notably different conversations with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
On July 25, 2019, then-President Donald Trump spoke with Zelenskyy from the White House residence, ostensibly to congratulate Zelenskyy on his election.
During that conversation, Trump reminded Zelenskyy that “the United States has been very good to Ukraine.”
Trump knew full well that Zelenskyy was desperate for some demonstration of support from the American president. Some 13,000 of Zelenskyy’s people already had been killed in the five-year conflict between Russian-backed separatists and government forces in Ukraine. Nonetheless, just days before phoning Zelenskyy, Trump froze nearly $400 million of U.S. aid to Ukraine.
Trump continued:
“I would like you to do us a favor, though, because our country has been through a lot, and Ukraine knows a lot about it…. There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution, and a lot of people want to find out about that, so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution, so if you can look into it. … It sounds horrible to me. .… I will have Mr. Giuliani give you a call, and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call, and we will get to the bottom of it.”
Zelenskyy did not want to offend Trump but did not commit to helping Trump dig up dirt on the son of the person most likely to oppose Trump in the 2020 election.
Fast-forward. On Feb. 20, 2023, just before the first anniversary of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Joe Biden spoke directly with Zelenskyy in Kyiv, noting that “Kyiv stands. And Ukraine stands. Democracy stands.”
For Trump, Ukraine was a pawn to get dirt on Biden before the 2020 election.
For Biden, Ukraine is a critical ally in America’s fight against global tyranny.
Trump’s goal in speaking with Zelenskyy in 2019 was the aggrandizement of Donald Trump. That was to be expected. As president, Trump had no agenda except to feed his monstrous ego. Trump described his 2019 call with Zelenskyy as “perfect” because Trump saw nothing wrong in suggesting that continuing U.S. support for Ukraine should hinge on Zelenskyy’s helping him win reelection.
Yet that phone call posed a direct challenge to American democracy. The use of presidential power to solicit a foreign nation’s help in getting reelected is not only barred by law and the Constitution; it undermines public trust in our system of self-government.
Biden’s goal in speaking with Zelenskyy in Kyiv was the opposite — to strengthen democracy against authoritarianism. As Biden explained, he made the dangerous trip because “I thought it was critical that there not be any doubt, none whatsoever, about U.S. support for Ukraine in the war. It’s not just about freedom in Ukraine. It’s about freedom of democracy at large.”
As Biden said the next day in Warsaw, Putin’s invasion of Ukraine had tested “all democracies.” Over the last year “the democracies of the world have grown stronger, not weaker. But the autocrats of the world have grown weaker, not stronger.”
For Biden, American policy — both foreign and domestic — should be premised on protecting democracy from authoritarian forces seeking to undermine it, whether that force is Vladimir Putin or Donald Trump.
Biden’s speech in Warsaw came just hours after Putin gave his own address in Moscow. Putin characterized the war in Ukraine as an existential struggle against the West, which he claimed started the war.
In response, Biden charged that “Putin chose this war,” and that “every day the war continues is his choice. “
By traveling to Kyiv, the oldest president in American history also demonstrated the stamina and grit of someone decades younger. Biden departed Andrews Air Force Base outside Washington, D.C., early Sunday morning, Feb. 19, landed in Poland, took a 10-hour train ride from the Polish border and arrived in Kyiv-Pasazhyrsky station roughly 24 hours after leaving Washington.
He then met with Zelenskyy at Mariinsky Palace, joined him in laying a wreath at the Wall of Remembrance at St. Michael’s Golden-Domed Monastery and stopped by the U.S. Embassy to meet with staff before heading back to the Polish border by train and then on to Warsaw.
The undertaking required courage and determination. Biden is the first president since Abraham Lincoln to venture into a war zone not under the control of American forces.
Donald Trump’s notorious conversation with Zelenskyy in 2019 required neither stamina, nor grit, nor courage. It did show determination — but not to protect democracy. It showed Trump’s fanatical resolve to remain in power, democracy be damned.
Robert Reich, former U.S. Secretary of Labor, is professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley and the author of “The System: Who Rigged It, How We Fix It.” His column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Lima News editorial board or AIM Media, owner of The Lima News.
