Subscribe to the Newspaper
Manage Subscription
Publish your Stuff
Need Help? Click Here
Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Afghanistan calls

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

Candidates voice concern about U.S. war and rebuilding efforts

The San Diego Union-Tribune

Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama's visit to Afghanistan should help refocus Americans' attention on our other war. It is attention that is very much needed.

There is no question that the far larger American-led effort in Iraq rightly has commanded more attention. It has been costlier in American blood and treasure, and arguably has far more importance to that region.

But Afghanistan, where the war on terror justifiably began, could be of more long-term strategic significance to the security interests of the United States. Al-Qaida, which attacked the United States on Sept. 11, 2001, still operates in and around Afghanistan. If U.S. efforts to fight terrorism in the long term are to succeed, we will need the help of the people and government of Afghanistan. Those efforts currently are in danger.

For one, Pakistan, which had been a key U.S. ally in the war on terror, has become, for a number of reasons, a less reliable partner. Its new, but weakening central government is exercising less control over the frontier regions with Afghanistan than even the unpopular Pakistan government of Pervez Musharraf did. And while the war cannot be waged successfully in Afghanistan without neutralizing al-Qaida and the Taliban in Pakistan, what is happening within Afghanistan's borders will require more U.S. and NATO focus.

The government of Afghan President Hamid Karzai is in trouble. Critics contend it controls little of the country outside the capital, Kabul. And corruption is said to run rampant.

But even more important to U.S.-led efforts in Afghanistan are that nation's people. Given the state of the nation at the time U.S. and NATO forces entered it to attack al-Qaida and the Taliban in October 2001, allied rebuilding efforts there have been heroic, but far short of what will be necessary. One governor told Obama during his visit that what was most needed in his province are paved roads and other infrastructure.

The Karzai government also has been weakened by the number of accidental civilian deaths during NATO military operations. Just this weekend, at least 13 civilians were killed. This year alone, nearly 100 Afghan civilians have died as an unintended result of NATO attacks.

Both Obama and presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain have voiced concern about the war and rebuilding efforts in Afghanistan. It will need to be a larger part of the responsibilities of the one who assumes office in January 2009.


See archived 'Editorials' Stories »
 


Reader Comments
From the editor: Many of you have expressed concerns about some of the harsh anonymous comments from readers. To remedy that, we are introducing new features. You can create your own blog, publish your news and share your photos with the community. Once you fill out a simple form and leave a verifiable e-mail address, you can set up your profile page. It will display all of your contributions and allow you to track issues and easily connect with others.

We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.


Jobs
Autos
Real Estate
Classifieds
Today's Ads
Search for Jobs - Monster.com
   
Weather
Yellow Pages
ADVERTISEMENT 
Event Calendar
Contests
Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
Publish Your Stuff
ADVERTISEMENT 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site